Re: Online enabling of checksums - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Online enabling of checksums
Date
Msg-id 20180223025339.ayoik45kcca7cl2s@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Online enabling of checksums  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
How does:

On 2018-02-23 11:48:16 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 11:24:37AM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> > I suspect I'm going to get some grief for this, but I think the time has
> > come to bite the bullet and support changing databases in the same
> > process...
> 
> I'd like to see that.  Last time this has been discussed, and Robert
> complained to me immediately when I suggested it, is that this is not
> worth it with the many complications around syscache handling and
> resource cleanup.

relate to:

> It is in the long term more stable to use a model
> where a parent process handles a set of children and decides to which
> database each child should spawn, which is what autovacuum does.

?


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Online enabling of checksums
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Translations contributions urgently needed