Re: Prefix operator for text and spgist support - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ildus Kurbangaliev
Subject Re: Prefix operator for text and spgist support
Date
Msg-id 20180219171915.65821d58@wp.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Prefix operator for text and spgist support  (Arthur Zakirov <a.zakirov@postgrespro.ru>)
Responses Re: Prefix operator for text and spgist support
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 15:06:51 +0300
Arthur Zakirov <a.zakirov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 06:03:27PM +0300, Ildus Kurbangaliev wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Attached patch introduces prefix operator ^@ for text type. For 'a
> > ^@ b' it returns true if 'a' starts with 'b'. Also there is spgist
> > index support for this operator.
> > 
> > It could be useful as an alternative for LIKE for 'something%'
> > templates. Or even used in LIKE queries instead of ~>=~ and ~<~ in
> > the future. But it would require new strategy for btree.  
> 
> I've looked at the patch. It is applied and tests pass.

Hi, thanks for the review.

> 
> I have a couple comments:
> 
> > +    if (ptype == Pattern_Type_Prefix)
> > +    {
> > +        char    *s = TextDatumGetCString(constval);
> > +        prefix = string_to_const(s, vartype);
> > +        pstatus = Pattern_Prefix_Partial;
> > +        rest_selec = 1.0;    /* all */
> > +        pfree(s);
> > +    }
> > +    else
> > +        pstatus = pattern_fixed_prefix(patt, ptype,
> > collation,
> > +
> > &prefix, &rest_selec);  
> 
> I think it is better to put Pattern_Type_Prefix processing into
> pattern_fixed_prefix() as another case entry.

At brief look at this place seems better to move this block into
pattern_fixed_prefix function. But there is also `vartype` variable
which used to in prefix construction, and it would require pass this
variable too. And since pattern_fixed_prefix called in 10 other places
and vartype is required only for this ptype it seems better just keep
this block outside of this function.

> 
> Secondly, it is worth to fix the documentation. At least here [1].
> Maybe there are another places where documentation should be fixed.
> 
> 
> 1 -
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/spgist-builtin-opclasses.html
> 

I've added documentation in current version of the patch.

-- 
---
Ildus Kurbangaliev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: SHA-2 functions
Next
From: Anastasia Lubennikova
Date:
Subject: Re: CURRENT OF causes an error when IndexOnlyScan is used