Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [SenderAddress Forgery]Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [SenderAddress Forgery]Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Date
Msg-id 20180118194100.dy3kxdtktsbvm4eq@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [SenderAddress Forgery]Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re:[Sender Address Forgery]Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Amit,

It seems your mail system continually adds "[Sender Address Forgery]"
prefixes to messages. E.g. this mail now has
Subject: Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [HACKERS] path toward
fasterpartition pruning
 
as its subject, whereas the mail you're replying to only had
Subject: Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
two of them.

I think the two previous occurances of this also are from you.

This is somewhat annoying, could you try to figure out a) what the
problem is b) how to prevent the subject being edited like that?

Regards,

Andres


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least9.5)?