Re: 10.1: hash index size exploding on vacuum full analyze - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From AP
Subject Re: 10.1: hash index size exploding on vacuum full analyze
Date
Msg-id 20171227044012.5ypisxbefx4otvyj@inml.weebeastie.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 10.1: hash index size exploding on vacuum full analyze  (Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 07:18:48PM +0300, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> > Initially, I have also thought of doing it in swap_relation_files, but
> > we don't have stats values there.  We might be able to pass it, but
> > not sure if there is any need for same.  As far as Toast table's case
> > is concerned, I don't see the problem because we are copying the data
> > row-by-row only for heap where the value of num_tuples and num_pages
> > could be different.  See  copy_heap_data.
> 
> Ok, agree. AP (sorry, I don't see your name), could your check that patch
> fixes your issue?

I shall. I think (hope - grr) the last on-fire issue has been squished* so 
things are looking good for me to poke this next week.

Andrew.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: 10.1: hash index size exploding on vacuum full analyze
Next
From: Murtuza Zabuawala
Date:
Subject: Re: pgadmin4 server error message processing