Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
Date
Msg-id 20171220212503.aamhlrs425flg47f@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table  (Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
I modified the regression test so that a partitioning hierarchy would be
left behind after the test is run, which is useful to test pg_upgrade
and pg_dump -- this caught one small bug.  That and some reading of the
diff resulted in v8, attach.

On my system, make check-world passes.  However, Thomas Munro's
automated patch tester seems to have a problem with the pg_upgrade test,
though I don't know what it is.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: Bitmap table scan cost per page formula
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: domain cast in parameterized vs. non-parameterized query