Re: PostgreSQL suitable? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: PostgreSQL suitable?
Date
Msg-id 20171219163915.GM4628@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL suitable?  (James Keener <jim@jimkeener.com>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL suitable?
List pgsql-general
Greetings,

* James Keener (jim@jimkeener.com) wrote:
> Would a storage block level incremental like zfs work?

This really depends on what you want out of your backups and just
exactly how the ZFS filesystem is set up.  Remember that any backup of
PG that doesn't use PG's start/stop backup must be atomic across all
tablespaces and even then that really just allows you to bring PG back
up as of that point of the snapshot.  I wouldn't recommend trying to
play WAL forward from that kind of a backup.  If you use do use
pg_start/stop_backup with ZFS snapshots, and make sure to track all of
the WAL that's generated between the start/stop backup and ensure it's
reliably stored, etc, then they can work, but it's not simple.

Thanks!

Stephen

Attachment

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL suitable?
Next
From: Vincenzo Romano
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL suitable?