Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes
Date
Msg-id 20171214211553.ijxfd4p52nz7qg44@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes  (Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:

> If you still thing that additional 16 bytes per relation in statistic is too
> high overhead, then I will also remove autotune.

I think it's pretty clear that these additional bytes are excessive.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: Top-N sorts verses parallelism
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Assertion failure when the non-exclusive pg_stop_backup aborted.