Re: [HACKERS] Pluggable storage - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Pluggable storage
Date
Msg-id 20171114104246.aijbulukit2pt6zj@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Pluggable storage  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Pluggable storage  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hmm.  Am I reading it right that this discussion led to moving
essentially all code from tqual.c to heapam?  Given the hard time we've
had to get tqual.c right, it seems fundamentally misguided to me to
require that every single storage AM reimplements all the visibility
routines.

I think that changing tqual's API (such as not passing HeapTuples
anymore but some other more general representation) would be okay and
should be sufficient, but this wholesale movement of code seems
dangerous and wasteful in terms of future reimplementations that will be
necessary.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] How to implement a SP-GiST index as a extension module?
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Migration to PGLister - After