Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I think your argument is sensible for some uses (where people run manual
> VACUUM after loading data) but not others (where people just use manual
> VACUUM in place of autovacuuming -- because they don't trust autovac, or
> the schedule isn't convenient, or whatever other reason). I've seen
> both things being done in production.
BTW I also noticed that creating an index does summarize the first range
(rather than leaving it empty, as this rationale would suggest). I
think we changed this at the last minute before commit in 9.5 and never
revisited; I'm inclined to change it for pg11 (but not now, of course).
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
