Re: [HACKERS] dropping partitioned tables without CASCADE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [HACKERS] dropping partitioned tables without CASCADE
Date
Msg-id 20171103081223.oydo4ictgc6znhob@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] dropping partitioned tables without CASCADE  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] dropping partitioned tables without CASCADE  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Amit Langote wrote:
> On 2017/09/06 19:14, Amit Langote wrote:
> > On 2017/09/06 18:46, Rushabh Lathia wrote:
> >> Okay, I have marked this as ready for committer.
> > 
> > Thanks Ashutosh and Rushabh for rebasing and improving the patch.  Looks
> > good to me too.
> 
> Patch needed to be rebased after the default partitions patch went in, so
> done.  Per build status on http://commitfest.cputube.org :)

I think adding "is partitioned" at end of line isn't good; looks like a
phrase but isn't translatable.  Maybe add keyword PARTITIONED instead?

Having the DEFAULT partition show up in the middle of the list is weird.
Is it possible to put it at either start or end of the list?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Kellerer
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11