Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use
Date
Msg-id 20171026175108.qdqgul7kc46dzhur@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Here is an updated patch set.  This is just a rebase of the previous
> set, no substantial changes.  Based on the discussion so far, I'm
> proposing that 0001 through 0007 could be ready to commit after review,
> whereas the remaining two need more work at some later time.

I gave this a quick run, to see if my compiler would complain for things
like this:
  bool        isprimary = flags & INDEX_CREATE_IS_PRIMARY;

(taken from the first patch at
https://postgr.es/m/20171023161503.ohkybquxrlech7d7@alvherre.pgsql )

which is assigning a value other than 1/0 to a bool variable without an
explicit cast.  I thought it would provoke a warning, but it does not.
Is that expected?  Is my compiler too old/new?

config.log says
gcc version 6.3.0 20170516 (Debian 6.3.0-18) 

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use
Next
From: Emre Hasegeli
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Flexible configuration for full-text search