Re: [HACKERS] fork()-safety, thread-safety - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [HACKERS] fork()-safety, thread-safety
Date
Msg-id 20171005225300.ha5gfkdbxk4zktku@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] fork()-safety, thread-safety  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2017-10-05 18:49:22 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> (There's certainly an argument to be made that no-one cares about
> platforms without thread support anymore.  But I'm unconvinced that
> rewriting existing code that works fine is the most productive
> way to exploit such a choice if we were to make it.)

Yea, that's pretty much what I'm thinking too.

- Andres


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] fork()-safety, thread-safety
Next
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] fork()-safety, thread-safety