On 2017-09-28 08:19:08 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> This is one of the MANY reasons test_decoding isn't suitable as the base
> for a replication solution. It has "test" in its name for a reason.
FWIW, I don't see why the unchanged toast stuff is that. It's clearly
discernible from actual datums, so ...
I agree that test_decoding isn't a great base of a replication tool, but
I don't think it's completely unsuitable, and I also think that ship has
sailed.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
