On 2017-09-24 13:36:56 +0300, Alvaro Hernandez wrote:
> However, if DMS uses it for what I'd call production use, I assume it is
> actually production quality. I bet they do enough testing, and don't ship
> software to potentially millions of customers if it doesn't work well. So...
> first, I'd consider this a a sign of robustness.
You've been in software for how long? ... ;) There's quite mixed
experiences with DMS.
FWIW, I don't think there's a huge problem w/ using test_decoding - the
output isn't pretty but it's parseable. It's too verbose due to
repeating column & type names (which also slows down), but...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
