Re: [HACKERS] Clarification in pg10's pgupgrade.html step 10(upgrading standby servers) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Clarification in pg10's pgupgrade.html step 10(upgrading standby servers)
Date
Msg-id 20170914183934.GA6595@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Clarification in pg10's pgupgrade.html step 10(upgrading standby servers)  (Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@visena.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Clarification in pg10's pgupgrade.html step 10(upgrading standby servers)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 04:31:09PM +0200, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> På onsdag 13. september 2017 kl. 15:26:27, skrev Bruce Momjian <
> bruce@momjian.us>:
> 
>     On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 01:35:17AM +0200, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
>     [snip]
>     > I know I'm being a little nitty-gritty here, but if it helps me
>     understand it
>     > might help others.
> 
>     I have applied the attached patch to show examples of using rsync on
>     PGDATA and tablespaces, documented that rsync is only useful when in
>     link mode, and explained more clearly how rsync handles links.  You can
>     see the results here:
> 
>     http://momjian.us/pgsql_docs/pgupgrade.html
> 
>     Any more improvements?
> 
>  
> Very nice!
>  
> For sake of completeness I think an example of running rsync when having pg_wal
> located outside the data directories would be helpful. Especially an example
> upgrading from 9.6 to 10 because of the name-change of pg_xlog -> pg_wal.

I think the tablespace example is clear enough to modify for WAL and we
instruct them right below that example to do WAL.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw super user checks
Next
From: Andreas Joseph Krogh
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Clarification in pg10's pgupgrade.html step 10(upgrading standby servers)