Re: [HACKERS] Red-black trees: why would anyone want preorder orpostorder traversal? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Aleksander Alekseev
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Red-black trees: why would anyone want preorder orpostorder traversal?
Date
Msg-id 20170911092416.GA31385@e733.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] Red-black trees: why would anyone want preorder or postorder traversal?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Tom,

> In short, therefore, I propose we rip out the DirectWalk and InvertedWalk
> options along with their support code, and then drop the portions of
> test_rbtree that are needed to exercise them.  Any objections?

Doesn't sound like something that will be used any time soon. When and
if it will happen nothing prevents us from adding this code back. So
it's +1.

--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage
Next
From: Konstantin Knizhnik
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization