Re: [HACKERS] Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test
Date
Msg-id 20170906135205.vv2bnbrotw25accb@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> I propose splitting the single Perl script into three separate test
> files: one for basic command-line option handling and so on (I would
> like to expand that later), one for the main upgrade test, and one for
> the funny database names tests.

Check.

> We also need to have a plan for handling the build farm.  Maybe keep the
> vcregress.pl upgradecheck target as a thin wrapper for the time being?

The buildfarm already runs "make check" in src/bin/ when TAP tests are
enabled, which should be enough to trigger the rewritten test, no?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Yura Sokolov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Walsender timeouts and large transactions
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Fix bloom WAL tap test