Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Jeff Janes wrote:
>
> > I'm attaching a patch for each option. Each one independently solves the
> > problem. But I think we should do both. There is no point in issuing
> > unnecessary kill system calls, and there may also be more spurious wake-ups
> > than just these ones.
>
> I modified patch 1 a bit -- result attached. I would like to back-patch
> this all the way back to 9.4, but there are a few conflicts due to
> c29aff959dc so I think I'm going to do pg10 only unless I get some votes
> that it should go further back. I think it should be fairly trivial to
> resolve.
Pushed patch 1 to master and pg10.
Please add the other one to commitfest.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services