Re: [HACKERS] Re: Poor cost estimate with interaction between tablecorrelation and partial indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: Poor cost estimate with interaction between tablecorrelation and partial indexes
Date
Msg-id 20170827152944.GC16801@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] Re: Poor cost estimate with interaction between table correlation andpartial indexes  (Michael Malis <michaelmalis2@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: Poor cost estimate with interaction between tablecorrelation and partial indexes  (Michael Malis <michaelmalis2@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 05:50:26PM -0700, Michael Malis wrote:
> Do you think this is a reasonable approach? Should I start working
> on a patch based on the solution I described or is there some other
> approach I should look into?

You'll get more traction with a proof-of-concept patch accompanying
the plan than without.  Don't bother with any level of care past
proof-of-concept until you get positive feedback.

Best,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] More replication race conditions
Next
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP Patch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors