Re: [HACKERS] One-shot expanded output in psql using \gx - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Noah Misch
Subject Re: [HACKERS] One-shot expanded output in psql using \gx
Date
Msg-id 20170817022441.GA3963697@rfd.leadboat.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] One-shot expanded output in psql using \gx  (Tobias Bussmann <t.bussmann@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] One-shot expanded output in psql using \gx  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Re: [HACKERS] One-shot expanded output in psql using \gx  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Re: [HACKERS] One-shot expanded output in psql using \gx  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Re: [HACKERS] One-shot expanded output in psql using \gx  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 10:24:34PM +0200, Tobias Bussmann wrote:
> I've tested the new \gx against 10beta and current git HEAD. Actually one of my favourite features of PostgreSQL 10!
Howeverin my environment it was behaving strangely. After some debugging I found that \gx does not work if you have
\setFETCH_COUNT n before. Please find attached a patch that fixes this incl. new regression test.
 

[Action required within three days.  This is a generic notification.]

The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item.  Stephen,
since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
item.  If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a
v10 open item, please let us know.  Otherwise, please observe the policy on
open item ownership[1] and send a status update within three calendar days of
this message.  Include a date for your subsequent status update.  Testers may
discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed
well in advance of shipping v10.  Consequently, I will appreciate your efforts
toward speedy resolution.  Thanks.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use