Thank you for the comment.
At Tue, 1 Aug 2017 16:27:41 -0400, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote in
<CA+TgmobbZrBPb7cvFj3ACPX2A_qSEB4ughRmB5dkGPXUYx_E+Q@mail.gmail.com>
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 5:42 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
> <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> > Another is getting rid of recursive call to run an execution
> > tree.
>
> That happens to be exactly what Andres did for expression evaluation
> in commit b8d7f053c5c2bf2a7e8734fe3327f6a8bc711755, and I think
> generalizing that to include the plan tree as well as expression trees
> is likely to be the long-term way forward here.
I read it in the source tree. The patch implements converting
expression tree to an intermediate expression then run it on a
custom-made interpreter. Guessing from the word "upside down"
from Andres, the whole thing will become source-driven.
> Unfortunately, that's probably another gigantic patch (that
> should probably be written by Andres).
Yeah, but async executor on the current style of executor seems
furtile work, or sitting until the patch comes is also waste of
time. So I'm planning to include the following sutff in the next
PoC patch. Even I'm not sure it can land on the coming
Andres'patch.
- Tuple passing outside call-stack. (I remember it was in the past of the thread around but not found)
This should be included in the Andres' patch.
- Give executor an ability to run from data-source (or driver) nodes to the root.
I'm not sure this is included, but I suppose he is aiming this kind of thing.
- Rebuid asynchronous execution on the upside-down executor.
regrds,
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
