[HACKERS] Re: [bug fix] PG10: libpq doesn't connect to alternative hosts whensome errors occur - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Noah Misch
Subject [HACKERS] Re: [bug fix] PG10: libpq doesn't connect to alternative hosts whensome errors occur
Date
Msg-id 20170728053049.GA2611952@rfd.leadboat.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [bug fix] PG10: libpq doesn't connect to alternativehosts when some errors occur  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses [HACKERS] Re: [bug fix] PG10: libpq doesn't connect to alternative hosts whensome errors occur
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 11:08:41AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki
> <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> >> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Peter Eisentraut
> >> The problem is that if we decide to change the behavior mid-beta, then we'll
> >> only have the rest of beta to find out whether people will like the other
> >> behavior.
> >>
> >> I would aim for the behavior that is most suitable for refinement in the
> >> future.  The current behavior seems to match that.
> >
> > I think the pre-final release period is the very timing for refinement, in the perspective of users and PG
developersas users.
 
> 
> Sure that is the correct period to argue.

We've reached that period.  If anyone is going to push for a change here, now
is the time.  Absent such arguments, the behavior won't change.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] map_partition_varattnos() and whole-row vars