Re: [HACKERS] New partitioning - some feedback - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: [HACKERS] New partitioning - some feedback
Date
Msg-id 20170707160303.GA26380@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] New partitioning - some feedback  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] New partitioning - some feedback
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 10:29:26AM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> Hi Mark,
> 
> On 2017/07/07 9:02, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> > I've been trying out the new partitioning in version 10. Firstly, I must
> > say this is excellent - so much nicer than the old inheritance based method!
> 
> Thanks. :)
> 
> > My only niggle is the display of partitioned tables via \d etc. e.g:
> >
> > part=# \d
> >                 List of relations
> >  Schema |         Name         | Type  |  Owner
> > --------+----------------------+-------+----------
> >  public | date_fact            | table | postgres
> >  public | date_fact_201705     | table | postgres
> >  public | date_fact_201706     | table | postgres
> >  public | date_fact_20170601   | table | postgres
> >  public | date_fact_2017060100 | table | postgres
> >  public | date_fact_201707     | table | postgres
> >  public | date_fact_rest       | table | postgres
> > (7 rows)

Would showing relispartition=tru tables only in \d+ fix this?

Best,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kaare Rasmussen
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Rust bindings to pgtypes lib
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SCRAM auth and Pgpool-II