Re: [HACKERS] pg_stop_backup(wait_for_archive := true) on standbyserver - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: [HACKERS] pg_stop_backup(wait_for_archive := true) on standbyserver
Date
Msg-id 20170630185911.GX1769@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] pg_stop_backup(wait_for_archive := true) on standbyserver  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] pg_stop_backup(wait_for_archive := true) on standby server
Re: [HACKERS] pg_stop_backup(wait_for_archive := true) on standby server
List pgsql-hackers
Peter, all,

* Peter Eisentraut (peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
> On 6/30/17 04:08, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> >> I'm not sure. I think this can be considered a bug in the implementation for
> >> 10, and as such is "open for fixing". However, it's not a very critical bug
> >> so I doubt it should be a release blocker, but if someone wants to work on a
> >> fix I think we should commit it.
> >
> > I agree with you. I'd like to hear opinions from other hackers as well.
>
> It's preferable to make it work.  If it's not easily possible, then we
> should prohibit it.
>
> Comments from Stephen (original committer)?

I agree that it'd be preferable to make it work, but I'm not sure I can
commit to having it done in short order.  I'm happy to work to prohibit
it, but if someone has a few spare cycles to make it actually work,
that'd be great.

In short, I agree with Magnus and feel like I'm more-or-less in the same
boat as he is (though slightly jealous as that's not actually physically
the case, for I hear he has a rather nice boat...).

Thanks!

Stephen

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Typo in comment in postgres_fdw.c
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CREATE COLLATION definitional questions for ICU