On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 09:42:10PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 6/21/17 22:47, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On 6/20/17 22:44, Noah Misch wrote:
> >>> A patch has been posted, and it's being reviewed. Next update Monday.
> >>
> >> This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send
> >> a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status
> >> update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
> >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com
> >
> > I'm not sure how to proceed here. Nobody is else seems terribly
> > interested, and this is really a minor issue, so I don't want to muck
> > around with the locking endlessly. Let's say, if there are no new
> > insights by Friday, I'll pick one of the proposed patches or just close
> > it without any patch.
>
> After some comments, a new patch has been posted, and I'll give until
> Monday for review.
This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send
a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status
update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com
