Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 10 changes in exclusion constraints - didsomething change? CASE WHEN behavior oddity - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 10 changes in exclusion constraints - didsomething change? CASE WHEN behavior oddity
Date
Msg-id 20170613012611.rnnjgbsqwf6qba5t@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 10 changes in exclusion constraints - did something change? CASE WHEN behavior oddity  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2017-06-12 21:03:31 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > Possibly too hard to be precise enough in a hint, but a number of these
> > could benefit from one suggesting moving things into FROM, using
> > LATERAL.
> 
> Maybe "You might be able to move the set-returning function into a
> LATERAL FROM item."?

WFM, seems at least better than the current and current-as-proposed
state.


- Andres



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pgrowlocks relkind check
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Fix a typo in shm_mq.c