Re: [HACKERS] Extra Vietnamese unaccent rules - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Extra Vietnamese unaccent rules
Date
Msg-id 20170606153121.GK14212@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Extra Vietnamese unaccent rules  (Dang Minh Huong <kakalot49@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Extra Vietnamese unaccent rules  (Man Trieu <man.trieu@gmail.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] Extra Vietnamese unaccent rules  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun  7, 2017 at 12:10:25AM +0900, Dang Minh Huong wrote:
> > On Jun 4, 29 Heisei, at 00:48, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> >>>> Shouldn't you use "or is_letter_with_marks()", instead of "or len(...)
> >>>>> 1"?  Your test might catch something that isn't based on a 'letter'
> >>>> (according to is_plain_letter).  Otherwise this looks pretty good to
> >>>> me.  Please add it to the next commitfest.
> >>> 
> >>> Thanks for confirm, sir.
> >>> I will add it to the next CF soon.
> >> 
> >> Sorry for lately response. I attach the update patch.
> > 
> > Uh, there is no patch attached.
> > 
> 
> Sorry sir, reattach the patch.
> I also added it to the next CF and set reviewers to Thomas Munro. Could you confirm for me.

There seems to be a problem.  I can't see a patch dated 2017-06-07 on
the commitfest page:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/14/1161/

I added the thread but there was no change.  (I think the thread was
already present.)  It appears it is not seeing this patch as the latest
patch.

Does anyone know why this is happening?

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Update comments in nodeModifyTable.c
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256