Re: [HACKERS] bumping HASH_VERSION to 3 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] bumping HASH_VERSION to 3
Date
Msg-id 20170520235632.GB17369@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] bumping HASH_VERSION to 3  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] bumping HASH_VERSION to 3  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 04:54:27PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> I will send an updated patch once we agree on above points.
> >>
> >> Sounds good.
> >
> > Attached patch addresses all the comments as discussed.
> 
> Committed.

Just checking, but you reused some of my code from the 8.3-8.4 migration
in pg_upgrade that was removed a while back, rather than writing it from
scratch, right?

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [Q] When should I use reg* types instead of oid in the system catalog?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pgindent (was Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Preventive maintenance in advance of pgindent run.)