Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions
Date
Msg-id 20170512233626.GB17839@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 06:38:55PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 5/12/17 18:13, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > I think for logical replication the tuple should appear as being in the
> > parent table, not the partition.  No?
> 
> Logical replication replicates base table to base table.  How those
> tables are tied together into a partitioned table or an inheritance tree
> is up to the system catalogs on each side.

This seems like a totally reasonable approach to pg_dump, especially
in light of the fact that logical replication already (and quite
reasonably) does it this way.  Hard work has been done to make
tuple-routing cheap, and this is one of the payoffs.

Best,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WITH clause in CREATE STATISTICS