Re: [HACKERS] Time based lag tracking for logical replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Noah Misch
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Time based lag tracking for logical replication
Date
Msg-id 20170511073203.GA828137@rfd.leadboat.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] Time based lag tracking for logical replication  (Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Time based lag tracking for logical replication  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 01:10:32AM +0200, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> The time based lag tracking commit [1] added interface for logging
> progress of replication so that we can report lag as time interval
> instead of just bytes. But the patch didn't contain patch for the
> builtin logical replication.
> 
> So I wrote something that implements this.

This is listed as a PostgreSQL 10 open item, but the above makes it sound like
a feature to consider for v11, not a defect in v10.  Why is this an open item?



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: logical replication syntax (was DROP SUBSCRIPTION,query cancellations and slot handling)
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Re: transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken (was:Declarative partitioning - another take)