Re: [HACKERS] SUBSCRIPTIONS and pg_upgrade - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Noah Misch
Subject Re: [HACKERS] SUBSCRIPTIONS and pg_upgrade
Date
Msg-id 20170508070358.GC1089054@rfd.leadboat.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] SUBSCRIPTIONS and pg_upgrade  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, May 06, 2017 at 11:50:16AM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 11:01:57AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On 5/2/17 21:44, Noah Misch wrote:
> > >> I wonder if we should have an --no-subscriptions option, now that they
> > >> are dumped by default, just like we have --no-blobs, --no-owner,
> > >> --no-password, --no-privileges, --no-acl, --no-tablespaces, and
> > >> --no-security-labels.  It seems like there is probably a fairly large
> > >> use case for excluding subscriptions even if you have sufficient
> > >> permissions to dump them.
> > > 
> > > [Action required within three days.  This is a generic notification.]
> > > 
> > > The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item.  Peter,
> > > since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
> > > item.  If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a
> > > v10 open item, please let us know.  Otherwise, please observe the policy on
> > > open item ownership[1] and send a status update within three calendar days of
> > > this message.  Include a date for your subsequent status update.  Testers may
> > > discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed
> > > well in advance of shipping v10.  Consequently, I will appreciate your efforts
> > > toward speedy resolution.  Thanks.
> > 
> > I consider this item low priority and don't plan to work on it before
> > all the other open items under logical replication are addressed.
> > 
> > (Here, working on it would include thinking further about whether it is
> > necessary at all or what alternatives might look like.)
> 
> That's informative, but it's not a valid status update.  This PostgreSQL 10
> open item is past due for your status update.  Kindly send a valid status
> update within 24 hours.  Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com

IMMEDIATE ATTENTION REQUIRED.  This PostgreSQL 10 open item is long past due
for your status update.  Please reacquaint yourself with the policy on open
item ownership[1] and then reply immediately.  If I do not hear from you by
2017-05-09 07:00 UTC, I will transfer this item to release management team
ownership without further notice.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Transition tables for triggers on foreign tables and views
Next
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] proposal psql \gdesc