Re: [HACKERS] Not getting error if ALTER SUBSCRIPTION syntax is wrong. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Noah Misch
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Not getting error if ALTER SUBSCRIPTION syntax is wrong.
Date
Msg-id 20170508065348.GM843225@rfd.leadboat.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Not getting error if ALTER SUBSCRIPTION syntax iswrong.  (Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, May 06, 2017 at 02:44:27PM +0200, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> On 05/05/17 19:51, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> > On 05/05/17 14:40, tushar wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> While testing 'logical replication' against v10 , i encountered one
> >> issue where data stop migrating after ALTER PUBLICATION.
> >>
> >> X Server
> >> \\ Make sure wal_level is set to logical in postgresql.conf file
> >> \\create table/Insert 1 row -> create table test(n int); insert into t
> >> values (1);
> >> \\create publication for all -> create publication pub for ALL TABLES ;
> >>
> >>
> >> Y server
> >>
> >> \\ Make sure wal_level is set to logical in postgresql.conf file
> >> \\create table -> create table test(n int);
> >>
> >> \\create Subscription
> >>
> >> CREATE SUBSCRIPTION sub CONNECTION 'host=localhost dbname=postgres
> >> port=5432 ' PUBLICATION pub;
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> I think probably syntax of alter subscription is not correct but
> >> surprisingly it is not throwing an error.
> >>
> > 
> > Syntax of ALTER command is correct, syntax of the connection string is
> > not, you are probably getting errors in log from the replication worker.
> > 
> > We could check validity of the connection string though to complain
> > immediately like we do in CREATE.
> > 
> 
> The attached does exactly that.

[Action required within three days.  This is a generic notification.]

The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item.  Peter,
since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
item.  If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a
v10 open item, please let us know.  Otherwise, please observe the policy on
open item ownership[1] and send a status update within three calendar days of
this message.  Include a date for your subsequent status update.  Testers may
discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed
well in advance of shipping v10.  Consequently, I will appreciate your efforts
toward speedy resolution.  Thanks.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Fix a typo in snapmgr.c
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression