Re: [GENERAL] Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bill Moran
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?
Date
Msg-id 20170505162124.c3b2ced0802b3a17eaf43b26@potentialtech.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?  (Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>)
List pgsql-general
On Fri, 5 May 2017 19:52:42 +0100
Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> wrote:

> Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> wrote:
> >
> > There's a well-written article I saw recently that directly addresses
> > your question ... I'm too lazy to find it, but google will probably
> > turn it up for you.
>
> This? http://renesd.blogspot.co.uk/2017/02/is-postgresql-good-enough.html

Oh, hey! You found it, thanks!

--
Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Peter J. Holzer"
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Caching and Blobs in PG? Was: Can PG replace redis,amqp, s3 in the future?
Next
From: Mathieu Fenniak
Date:
Subject: [GENERAL] Logical decoding CPU-bound w/ large number of tables