On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 10:43:34AM +0200, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
> Hello Bruce,
>
> >I have committed the first draft of the Postgres 10 release notes. They
> >are current as of two days ago, and I will keep them current. Please
> >give me any feedback you have.
>
> About:
>
> """
> Fix psql \p to always print what would be executed by \g or \w (Daniel
> Vérité)
>
> Previously \p didn't properly print the reverted-to command after a
> buffer contents reset. CLARIFY?
> """
>
> The fix is linked to the change introduced by Tom when refactoring/cleaning
> up in e984ef586 (\if) which change psql's \p behavior.
>
> This is not a user visible change version-to-version, it is more like a bug
> fix for a bug/behavioral change introduced within pg10 developement process
> itself.
>
> I'm not sure how this should appear in the release notes. Maybe not at all,
> associated to the feature in which the behavioral change was introduced...
Agreed, I removed the item and moved those commits to the \if item.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
