Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication in the same cluster - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication in the same cluster
Date
Msg-id 20170502143727.smgn2oxou4yjma3f@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication in the same cluster  (Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication in the same cluster
List pgsql-hackers
On 2017-05-02 09:17:27 +0200, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> Yes because otherwise we risk leaving slot on the upstream if the
> command fails downstream.

Shouldn't temporary slots be able to solve that concern?  Create it as
temporary at the beginning, mark it as permanent at the end?

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical replication syntax (was DROP SUBSCRIPTION,query cancellations and slot handling)
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining