Re: [GENERAL] Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bill Moran
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?
Date
Msg-id 20170501174236.aefbb83028cee12d04a3ead3@potentialtech.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?  (Thomas Güttler <guettliml@thomas-guettler.de>)
List pgsql-general
On Mon, 1 May 2017 22:02:15 +0200
Thomas Güttler <guettliml@thomas-guettler.de> wrote:
> Leaving two things open:
>
>  - blob storage
>  - redis/caching

I've used Postgres for both of these purposes, and at the load
level we were experiencing at the time, it worked fine.

We later implemented Redis when our caching requirements exceeded
what Postgres could do in that capacity. We never switched to
anything else for blob storage, as Postgres was always sufficient.

--
Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Sven R. Kunze"
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?
Next
From: Bill Moran
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?