Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining
Date
Msg-id 20170430232133.o7tcwxja7w6ah4jv@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2017-04-30 07:19:21 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> why we cannot to introduce GUC option - enable_cteoptfence ?

Doesn't really solve the issue, and we've generally shied away from GUCs
that influence behaviour after a few bad experiences.  What if you want
one CTE inlined, but another one not?

- Andres



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Crash when partition column specified twice