Hi,
I've lately seen more and more installations where the generation of
write-ahead-log (WAL) is one of the primary bottlenecks. I'm curious
whether that's primarily a "sampling error" of mine, or whether that's
indeed more common.
The primary reason I'm curious is that I'm pondering a few potential
optimizations, and would like to have some guidance which are more and
which are less important.
Questions (answer as many you can comfortably answer):
- How many MB/s, segments/s do you see on busier servers?
- What generates the bulk of WAL on your servers (9.5+ can use
pg_xlogdump --stats to compute that)?
- Are you seeing WAL writes being a bottleneck?OA
- What kind of backup methods are you using and is the WAL volume a
problem?
- What kind of replication are you using and is the WAL volume a
problem?
- What are your settings for wal_compression, max_wal_size (9.5+) /
checkpoint_segments (< 9.5), checkpoint_timeout and wal_buffers?
- Could you quickly describe your workload?
Feel free to add any information you think is pertinent ;)
Greetings,
Andres Freund
