Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Statistics "dependency" - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Statistics "dependency"
Date
Msg-id 20170423140116.GA26652@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Statistics "dependency"  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Do we need multi-column frequency/histogram stats? WAS Re:[HACKERS] Statistics "dependency"  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 11:44:12AM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> For us "functional dependency" would sound like something to do with
> functions (e.g. CREATE FUNCTION), so just "dependency" appears to me
> to be the best term for this.
> 
> There are multiple statistics for dependency stored, hence
> "dependencies". I don't like it, but its the best term I can see at
> present.

OK, thank you for the reply, and I am sorry I forgot the previous
discussion.  I just wanted to re-check we had research this.  Thanks.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] A note about debugging TAP failures
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Do we need multi-column frequency/histogram stats? WAS Re:[HACKERS] Statistics "dependency"