Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken
Date
Msg-id 20170417154549.ngigpsstbevah2yd@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2017-04-15 14:34:28 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2017-04-15 17:30:21 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > > On 2017-04-15 16:48:05 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> Concretely, I propose the attached patch.  We'd have to put it into
> > >> all supported branches, since culicidae is showing intermittent
> > >> "could not reattach to shared memory" failures in all the branches.
> > 
> > > That seems quite reasonable.
> > 
> > Pushed, please update culicidae's settings.
> 
> Done, although there were already builds running by the time I got to
> it, so there'll be a few unaffected runs.  I've increased build
> frequency of all branches to be forced once-an-hour, so we can quickly
> see how reliable it is.  Will turn down Monday or such, if everything
> looks good.

Looking through all the branches, it seems to have done the trick - the
previous irregular failures seem to be gone.  Nice.

Unless somebody complains, I'll reduce the forced build frequency to
something more normal again.

- Andres



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PANIC in pg_commit_ts slru after crashes
Next
From: Dan Langille
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] PGCon 2017 registration now open