On 2017-04-07 00:01:01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Still, it's not very clear why we need to cater for building just libpq
> rather than the whole distribution, and a user of win32.mak presumably
> has the option to do the latter.
I think the raison d'etre for that infrastructure primarily comes from
the times where windows wasn't supported for server builds?
+1 for yanking this out.
- Andres
