Re: [HACKERS] parallel explain analyze support not exercised - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [HACKERS] parallel explain analyze support not exercised
Date
Msg-id 20170406213641.tvpjk6smqw7cq3z6@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] parallel explain analyze support not exercised  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2017-04-06 17:33:49 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > I guess we'll have to see. My personal conclusion is that greater
> > coverage of parallelism is worth some very minor config trouble for
> > people doing installcheck against clusters with non-default config.
> 
> The buildfarm seems entirely unwilling to play along.

That was the parallel bitmap scan test, not this (I think).  I've
already pushed a fix which should address the issue - it at least does
so locally.  Both Dilip and I had apparently forgotten that we disallow
setting effective_io_concurrency on platforms without USE_PREFETCH
support.

- Andres



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] parallel explain analyze support not exercised
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Collect and use multi-columndependency stats