On 2017-04-05 10:48:27 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > On 2017-03-31 20:23:39 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> 0001 has the problem that we have a firm rule against putting any
> >> #includes whatsoever before "postgres.h". This stdbool issue has come
> >> up before, though, and I fear we're going to need to do something
> >> about it.
>
> > I think in this case it makes sense to deviate from that rule,
> > temporarily and locally.
>
> I'd really rather not. It might be safe here, because this code
> only works on Linux anyway, but it's still a dangerous precedent.
Well, what's the alternative for v10? There's already precedent btw.,
cf plperl.h undefining bool.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
