Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
Date
Msg-id 20170403232613.dcd4rzbhad2nkh2p@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
Responses Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2017-04-04 09:24:23 +1000, Vaishnavi Prabakaran wrote:
> Hi,
> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 7:05 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> 
> > On 2017-04-03 14:10:47 +1000, Vaishnavi Prabakaran wrote:
> > > > The CF has been extended until April 7 but time is still growing short.
> > > > Please respond with a new patch by 2017-04-04 00:00 AoE (UTC-12) or
> > this
> > > > submission will be marked "Returned with Feedback".
> > > >
> > > >
> > > Thanks for the information, attached the latest patch resolving one
> > > compilation warning. And, please discard the test patch as it will be
> > > re-implemented later separately.
> >
> > Hm.  If the tests aren't ready yet, it seems we'll have to move this to
> > the next CF.
> >
> >
> Thanks for your review and I will address your review comments and send the
> newer version of patch shortly.

Cool.

> Just quickly, Is it not ok to consider only the code patch for this CF
> without test patch?

I'd say no, it's not acceptable.  This is too much new code for it not
to be tested.

Andres



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vaishnavi Prabakaran
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
Next
From: Claudio Freire
Date:
Subject: Re: Making clausesel.c Smarter