Re: Keycloak and Postgres - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bill Moran
Subject Re: Keycloak and Postgres
Date
Msg-id 20170401065720.1b2ce005ce9e206a060ef81c@potentialtech.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Keycloak and Postgres  (Marc Tempelmeier <marc.tempelmeier@flane.de>)
List pgsql-general
On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 13:58:36 +0000
Marc Tempelmeier <marc.tempelmeier@flane.de> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have a replication question, we have some big Cisco UCS VM thingy, where VMs are snapshotted, the drives are
abstractedetc. If a VM crashes it will be resumed in 1 min from another rack. What brings us master slave replication
orsome other kind of replication in this setup? Should we do it because of other failures? 

Because of how Postgres caches changes, you may find that a failover
requires some time in recovery mode. Those VM snapshot systems are great,
but they aren't quite perfect if they don't know what is being done with
the data on the drives.

Whether it's good enough depends heavily on what your expectation is.
Before trusting it to meet your needs, I would spend some time simulating
failures and seeing what actually happens.

--
Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: ""
Date:
Subject: Re: Confusing order by error
Next
From: Tom DalPozzo
Date:
Subject: vacuum on table with all rows frozen