Fujii Masao wrote:
> This is the evidence that no one cares about the details of VACUUM VERBOSE
> output example. So I'm tempted to simplify the example (please see the
> attached patch) instead of keeping updating the example.
Agreed.
> > If this patch is applied, it should back-patch to all supported
> > branches.
>
> Not sure if it's worth back-patching that.
I see no reason to keep it in back branches either.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
