Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Query fails when SRFs are part of FROM clause (Commitid: 69f4b9c85f) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Query fails when SRFs are part of FROM clause (Commitid: 69f4b9c85f)
Date
Msg-id 20170309194605.GR9812@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Query fails when SRFs are part of FROM clause (Commit id: 69f4b9c85f)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Tom, all,

* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 6:54 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >> If you don't want to make ExecInitExpr responsible, then the planner would
> >> have to do something like split_pathtarget_at_srf anyway to decompose the
> >> expressions, no matter which executor representation we use.
>
> > Did we do anything about this?  Are we going to?
>
> No, and I think we should.  Is it on the v10 open items list?

Wasn't, I've added it now:

https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_10_Open_Items

Thanks!

Stephen

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Query fails when SRFs are part of FROM clause (Commit id: 69f4b9c85f)
Next
From: "Sven R. Kunze"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] adding an immutable variant of to_date