Re: [HACKERS] Change in "policy" on dump ordering? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Change in "policy" on dump ordering?
Date
Msg-id 20170306140101.GQ9812@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Change in "policy" on dump ordering?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Change in "policy" on dump ordering?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
* Peter Eisentraut (peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
> On 3/6/17 03:33, Michael Banck wrote:
> > Would this be a candidate for backpatching, or is the behaviour change
> > in pg_dump trumping the issues it solves?
>
> Unless someone literally has a materialized view on pg_policy, it
> wouldn't make a difference, so I'm not very keen on bothering to
> backpatch this.

Agreed.

Thanks!

Stephen

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP: [[Parallel] Shared] Hash
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)