Re: [HACKERS] ANALYZE command progress checker - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [HACKERS] ANALYZE command progress checker
Date
Msg-id 20170301182823.7ug4vkyo4et3j33d@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] ANALYZE command progress checker  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] ANALYZE command progress checker  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2017-03-01 10:25:49 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> We now have a framework for this [1] (currently used by vacuum, but
> extensible). The question is about presentation.  I'm fairly sure that
> we shouldn't just add yet another framework, and I doubt that that's
> what's proposed by Peter.
> 
> [1]
> https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=c16dc1aca5e

Majority of that is actually in
https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=b6fb6471f6afaf649e52f38269fd8c5c60647669



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ANALYZE command progress checker
Next
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication existing data copy