Re: [HACKERS] ANALYZE command progress checker - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: [HACKERS] ANALYZE command progress checker
Date
Msg-id 20170301182041.GD14166@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] ANALYZE command progress checker  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] ANALYZE command progress checker
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:45:40AM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2/28/17 04:24, vinayak wrote:
> > The view provides the information of analyze command progress details as 
> > follows
> > postgres=# \d pg_stat_progress_analyze
> >            View "pg_catalog.pg_stat_progress_analyze"
> 
> Hmm, do we want a separate "progress" system view for every kind of
> command?  What if someone comes up with a progress checker for CREATE
> INDEX, REINDEX, CLUSTER, etc.?

Some kind of design for progress seems like a good plan.  Some ideas:

- System view(s)
   This has the advantage of being shown to work at least to a PoC by   this patch, and is similar to extant system
viewslike   pg_stat_activity in the sense of capturing a moment in time.
 

- NOTIFY
   Event-driven model as opposed to a polling one.  This is   attractive on efficiency grounds, less so on reliability
ones.

- Something added to the wire protocol
   More specialized, limits the information to the session where the   command was issued

- Other things not named here

Best,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Possible spelling fixes
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ANALYZE command progress checker